So Iran is a deadly threat to everyone in the world. Yup, those crazy Islamic fundies are going to with the 1 or 2 bombs they can't even begin to make for years to come threaten the USA with its 1500 or so Transcontinential baslistic missles and silos with the planes and weapons already in the east, or a threat to the EU which has more nukes then you can dream of, enough to kill most of us alive today, or ... shall I go on ? No, its another sad ploy to have a change of goverment and more control of the oil in the region.
Ok so today, this happens :
Reuters.com reported :
By Parisa Hafezi
TEHRAN (Reuters) - Defiant Iran said it would end snap U.N. nuclear checks on Sunday, a day after the U.N. atomic watchdog voted to report the Islamic Republic to the Security Council over concerns about its nuclear program.
Ramping up the rhetoric against Tehran after the vote, President Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the vote sent a "clear message" to Iran. "The world will not stand by if Iran continues on the path to a nuclear weapons capability," Rice said in a statement. The International Atomic Energy Agency voted on Saturday to refer Iran to the Security Council. But the top U.N. body will take no action, including possibly imposing sanctions, until an IAEA report on Iran is delivered in March.
The only way Tehran could avoid Security Council action, U.S. ambassador to the IAEA Gregory Schulte said, was to halt nuclear fuel enrichment and continue letting IAEA inspectors to conduct snap checks of Iranian nuclear sites. But instead of giving in to the latest rebuke from the West, Iran said it would no longer abide by the so-called Additional Protocol it signed in 2003 under pressure from the West allowing for snap inspections.
"Because of the resolution of the IAEA ... the organization should stop voluntary implementation of the Additional Protocol and other cooperation from Sunday," Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Saturday.
Iran signed the protocol to the Non-Proliferation Treaty after saying it had carried out secret atomic work for 18 years. Iran says its nuclear program is designed solely to generate electricity, not bombs as the West suspects, and claims a sovereign right to make uranium fuel on its own soil. There was no word on Iranian plans on fuel enrichment. Germany, France and Britain, the "EU3", initiated the IAEA resolution but concrete Security Council action is likely to come slowly, if at all.
This is great news for the war mongers. Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran would in essence lock up most of the regions oil, and if not locked up open the sea ways and the land to build pipelines. It would create more war for Halliburton and companies like that to profit and keep public opinion away from the eroding civil rights around the world. AROUND THE WORLD !?! , yes I mean that.
In Britain LINK HERE they passed an act similar to the Pat Acts in the USA. Britain introduced the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (ACTSA) following 9/11 to hold secret trials and detain foreign citizens indefinitely. Fourteen men have been in detention without trial for close to two years now under this Act.
Some elements of that legislation would also now apply to British subjects if Blunkett has his way.
"This is the law of the jungle," chief executive of the independent Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) Habib Rahman told IPS. "This kind of thing is simply not on in any democratic society. Draconian measures were introduced earlier, and now there are more. We do not know where this is going to end."
The new powers are hardly likely to stop suicide bombers, he said. "There is no shortage of strong laws in Israel, but these bombings are only on the rise."Britain's reputation as a country with civilized laws is bound to be tarnished by such measures, Rahman said. "There is no shortage of despotic regimes, and if Britain has such laws, with what face can it talk to the others?"
Labour member of the House of Lords and leading barrister Helena Kennedy told the BBC Radio 4's Today program: "It is as if David Blunkett takes his lessons on jurisprudence from Robert Mugabe (president of Zimbabwe). He really is a shameless authoritarian."
The Conservative Party which has traditionally been seen as the party of the right in Britain joined civil liberty groups in challenging the proposal by a Labour minister. Shadow home secretary David Davis said that the move to lower the burden of evidence behind closed doors was hardly "an advance in our justice system."
Davis said terrorists wanted to target the west because they "hate our civilization." He added in an interview on BBC: "What are we fighting for if we throw away the very freedoms we are fighting for?" Amnesty International said that if implemented, these measures would "dispense with justice, the rule of law and human rights in the UK." Amnesty said: "Instead of further undermining the rule of law and human rights, the UK authorities should start to pay attention to the concerns currently being expressed by people and organizations from many different walks of life."
The detention of 14 foreign nationals has "already created a small Guantanamo Bay in the UK," Amnesty said. "Any measures to extend these measures to UK. citizens must be resisted."
Why worry about Australia, they have like France a convieient and often effective social tool being used by those pulling the strings, racial tension between Muslims and Non-Muslims. Now I am not saying theycomtrol the Muslims, but immergration laws, work and their overall treamment can lead to social unrest, and the MEDIA plays a huge part in making sure boths sides see the worst of each other. Besides, Australia is the only industrialised country without a human rights act or its equivalent. Despite being a founding member of the United Nations and a signatory to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, successive Australian governments have failed to legislate for human rights here.
International human rights law does not translate automatically into Australian law. For example, when the UN Human Rights Committee held that the laws in Tasmania that prohibited gay sex were in breach of the right to privacy, the federal government had to pass the Human Rights (Sexual Conduct) Act 1994 to give that human right legal force in Tasmania. This example is used only since it is what most of society deems against the grain, now just add Facists laws and where are their rights ?
********************************************************
I'll Post later why Iran cannot and will not build nukes.
Like this article? Subscribe to the RSS feed!
No comments:
Post a Comment